Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Minocycline ±¹¼Ò ¾à¹° ¹æÃâ Á¦Á¦ÀÇ Ä¡ÁÖÁúȯ Ä¡·á È¿°ú

Effects of locally-delivered minocycline hcl on controlled periodontal disease

´ëÇÑÄ¡ÁÖ°úÇÐȸÁö 1998³â 28±Ç 1È£ p.37 ~ 56
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¤¹ÌÇö/Mi-Hyun Chung ±Ç¿µÇõ/ÇãÀÍ/À̸¸¼·/¹ÚÁغÀ/Young-Hyuk Kwon/Yeek Herr/Man-Sup Lee/Joon-Bong Park

Abstract

°á ·Ð
ÁøÇàµÈ Ä¡ÁÖÁúȯ ȯÀÚ¸¦ Ä¡·áÇϱâ À§Çؼ­ Ä¡¼® Á¦°Å¼ú ¹× Ä¡±Ù¸é È°ÅüúÈÄ¿¡ ºÎ°¡ÀûÀÎ Ä¡
·á·Î¼­ minocycline strip°ú gel ±¹¼Ò¾à¹° ¹æÃâÁ¦Á¦¸¦ Åõ¿©ÈÄ ÀÌµé °¢°¢ÀÇ È¿°ú¸¦ Æò°¡ÇÏ°í
ÀÚ, Ä¡ÁÖ³¶ ±íÀÌ°¡ 5-8§®ÀÎ Ä¡¾Æ°¡ 1/4¾Ç °¢°¢¿¡¼­ ÃÖ¼ÒÇÑ 2°³ ÀÌ»óÀÎ ÁøÇàµÈ Ä¡ÁÖ¿°À» °¡
Áø ȯÀÚ 25¸íÀ» ´ë»óÀ¸·Î ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 0, 6, 10, 14, 20ÁÖ¿¡ ÀÓ»óÁö¼ö °Ë»ç(Ä¡ÅÂÁö¼ö, Ä¡ÀºÃâÇ÷Áö
¼ö, Ä¡ÁÖ³¶±íÀÌ, Ä¡ÀºÅðÃà)¿Í ¹Ì»ý¹° °Ë»ç(Ä¡ÁÖº´ÀÎ±Õ À¯¹« ÆÇÁ¤°Ë»ç, À§»óÂ÷Çö¹Ì°æÇÏ¿¡¼­ ¼¼
±ÕÀÇ ºÐÆ÷)¸¦ ½Ç½ÃÇÏ¿© À̵éÀÇ º¯È­¸¦ ºñ±³, °üÂûÇÑ °á°ú ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. mulocycline strip ±¹¼Ò¾à¹° ¹æÃâÁ¦Á¦»ç¿ë±º¿¡¼­ »ý¸®½Ä¿°¼ö¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ ±º°ú ºñ±³ÇÏ¿©
Ä¡ÀºÃâÇ÷Áö¼ö, Ä¡ÁÖ³¶±íÀÌ¿Í Ä¡ÁÖº´ÀÎ±Õ À¯¹« ÆÇÁ¤°Ë»ç¿¡¼­ À¯ÀǼºÀÖ´Â °¨¼Ò¸¦ º¸¿´°í À§»ó
Â÷ Çö¹Ì°æ °Ë»ç¿¡¼­µµ ƯÈ÷ ³ª¼±Çü ¼¼±Õ°ú ¿îµ¿¼º ¸·´ëÇü ¼¼±ÕÀÇ »ó´ëÀû ºÐÆ÷°¡ °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´À¸
¸ç ±¸±ÕÇü ¼¼±ÕÀÇ »ó´ëÀû ºÐÆ÷´Â À¯ÀǼºÀÖ°Ô Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
2. minocycline gel ±¹¼Ò¾à¹° ¹æÃâÁ¦Á¦¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ ±º¿¡¼­µµ »ý¸®½Ä¿°¼ö¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÑ ±º°ú ºñ±³
ÇÏ¿© Ä¡ÀºÃâÇ÷Áö¼ö, Ä¡ÁÖ³¶ ±íÀÌ¿Í Ä¡ÁÖº´ÀÎ±Õ À¯¹« ÆÇÁ¤°Ë»ç¿¡¼­ À¯ÀǼºÀÖ´Â °¨¼Ò¸¦ ³ªÅ¸
³Â°í À§»óÂ÷Çö¹Ì°æ°Ë»ç¿¡¼­µµ strip»ç¿ë±º°ú À¯»çÇÑ °á°ú¸¦ ³ªÅ¸³Â´Ù.
3. minocycline strip»ç¿ë±º°ú minocycline gel »ç¿ë±º »çÀÌ¿¡´Â ¸ðµç ÀÓ»ó°Ë»ç¿Í ¹Ì»ý¹°°Ë
»ç¿¡¼­ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ´Â Â÷À̸¦ º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and microbiological outcomes
following the use of 30% minocycline-loaded polycaprolacton film and 2%
minocycline-loaded gel that was applied locally Into pockets combined with scaling and
root planing. 25 human subjects who were non-pregnant, non-lactating, aged 20-50 and
diagnosed as moderate to advanced adult periodontitis were enrolled. Subjects were
excluded f they had a history of severe acute or chronic systemic disease, if they
required antibiotic prophylaxis for dental treatment fort any reason, or chronic they
reported a history suggestive of hypersensitivity reactions to minocycline or tetracycline.
4 quadrants that had several teeth with a 5-8mm probing pocket depth and radiographic
evidence of alveolar bone loss for each patient were selected and divided into test sites
and control sites according to the split-mouth design. Scaling and root planing was done
for each sites at baseline(0week). Test sites received the minocycline gel and strip and
control sites had saline irrigation. The patients received both treatments simyltaneously.
Subgingival irrigation of sterile saline was applied to the control sites for approximately
30 seconds. Minocycline strip and gel was applied alto the periodontal pocket at 1, 2, 3,
4 weeks each after scaling and root planing in the test sites. The clinical and
microbiological measurements were made at baseline and at the follow-up visits 6, 10,
14, 20 weeks.
The results of this study were as follows ;
1. The sulcular bleeding index, probing pocket depth and Periocheck test was
significantly reduced and the relative proportions of spirochetes and motile rods were
significantly reduced and the proportion of cocci was correspondingly increased, in
locally delivered minocycline strip group compared to saline irrigation group.
2. In locally delivered minocycline gel group, The effect was the same with
minocycline strip group as compared with saline irrigation therapy.
3. There was no significant differences between minocycline strip group and
minocycline gel group.
In conclusion, minocycline HCI local drug delivery combined with scaling and root
planing may provide added improvement of clinical and microbiological responses by
inhibiting bacterial recolonization of treated sites. It is suggested that the local
administration of minocycline-HCI in the periodontal pocket Is effective when combined
with subgingival mechanical debridement.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI